@TKCfhead
Why don't you just goto the police and report me?
Here is a simple answer, you cant!
The point you are miss is that this here is a memory hack.
It don't modify any of BIS's copyrighted data, it only makes a small change to the data in the computers memory.
If this was against the law then all the largest pay-for-hacks sites would of been out of business a long time ago (poor MSX).
@all
From BIS forum
Then my friend activated his Multihack. First we tried infinite ammo. Result: cheat worked, no reaction from ARMAAC. Then increased Speed. Still no reaction from ARMAAC. Same with noFog and noGrass. The cheats worked all and no reaction from ARMAAC.
I would like to point out that ArmAAC does not yet detect every single possible cheat. It currently only covers weapons modifications and, toa certain extent, modded menus. It can also only detect modifications of configs.
It's official from the author himself. ArmAAC cant stop ArmA MultiHack.
308D Unauthorised modification of data with intent to cause impairment
(1) A person who:
(a) causes any unauthorised modification of data held in a computer, and
(b) knows that the modification is unauthorised, and
(c) intends by the modification to impair access to, or to impair the reliability, security or operation of, any data held in a computer, or who is reckless as to any such impairment,
is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
(2) A conviction for an offence against this section is an alternative verdict to a charge for:
(a) an offence against section 195 (Maliciously destroying or damaging property), or
(b) an offence against section 308E (Unauthorised impairment of electronic communication).
furhter to this:
308E Unauthorised impairment of electronic communication
(1) A person who:
(a) causes any unauthorised impairment of electronic communication to or from a computer, and
(b) knows that the impairment is unauthorised, and
(c) intends to impair electronic communication to or from the computer, or who is reckless as to any such impairment,
is guilty of an offence.
Maximum penalty: Imprisonment for 10 years.
(2) A conviction for an offence against this section is an alternative verdict to a charge for:
(a) an offence against section 195 (Maliciously destroying or damaging property), or
(b) an offence against section 308D (Unauthorised modification of data with intent to cause impairment).
So there it is its straight up, its illigal to hack with the intention to inhibit the performance of the server or cause it to crash. Its illigal to obtain data from the servers without autherisation or to "hack" server in order to cause it some sort of damage or "slow down". Hence our server rules relfect this.